FREE Case Evaluation: 1-888-887-3117

Contact

Locked Up and Let Down: Addressing Sex Abuse in Detention Centers

Detention Center Sex Abuse Crisis | Justice Hero

The Hidden Crisis Behind Bars

Detention center sex abuse is a widespread problem affecting thousands of people in juvenile and immigration facilities across the United States. This systemic issue often goes unreported due to power imbalances, fear of retaliation, and inadequate oversight mechanisms.

Key Facts About Detention Center Sex Abuse:

  • Prevalence: 5.8% of incarcerated youth reported staff sexual misconduct (BJS, 2020)
  • Immigration Facilities: 922 sexual assault allegations reported from 2018-2022
  • Underreporting: Most experts believe actual rates are significantly higher
  • Staff Perpetrators: 29.5% of immigration facility allegations involve staff
  • Low Accountability: Only 31% of substantiated staff-on-youth cases result in legal action

The reality of detention center abuse extends far beyond isolated incidents. Between 2000 and 2015, sexual abuse was documented in juvenile detention facilities across 29 states and the District of Columbia. Recent legislative changes have enabled thousands of survivors to come forward, with over 3,500 lawsuits filed in Maryland alone since the Child Victims Act took effect in 2023.

"The thing that was supposed to protect me the most was actually the thing I felt like hurt me the most," explained one survivor who was assaulted while on suicide watch in a juvenile facility.

I'm Tim Burd, founder of Justice Hero, where I've spent years advocating for victims of institutional abuse and helping connect survivors of detention center sex abuse with legal resources to seek justice and accountability.

Statistics on sexual abuse in detention centers showing prevalence rates, reporting trends, and accountability measures across juvenile and immigration detention facilities from 2010-2022 - detention center sex abuse infographic

The Scope of Detention Center Sex Abuse in the U.S.

The true extent of detention center sex abuse is difficult to measure due to significant underreporting, but available data paints a disturbing picture. This isn't a problem confined to a few "bad apples" or isolated facilities—it's a nationwide crisis that spans both juvenile detention centers and immigration facilities.

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 7.1% of youth in juvenile detention reported sexual victimization in 2018, down from 9.5% in 2012. While this decline appears encouraging, experts caution that these numbers likely represent only a fraction of actual incidents. The power dynamics within these institutions and fear of retaliation create an environment where many victims remain silent.

Perhaps most alarming is that staff members—the very people entrusted with protecting these vulnerable populations—are frequently the perpetrators. A 2020 BJS report found that 5.8% of incarcerated youth reported inappropriate sexual contact from staff or guards. In many cases, these staff members use their authority to coerce or manipulate detainees, offering special privileges, contraband, or protection in exchange for sexual acts.

Juvenile Detention Center Sex Abuse Statistics

The statistics on detention center sex abuse in juvenile facilities are particularly troubling:

  • 7.1% of detained youth reported sexual victimization in 2018
  • 5.8% specifically reported staff sexual misconduct
  • Boys (6.1%) were more likely than girls (2.9%) to report staff-related sexual activity
  • Girls (4.7%) were more likely than boys (1.6%) to report peer-related sexual victimization
  • Children with previous sexual abuse histories are 52% more likely to be victimized in detention
  • Previous victims are 697% more likely to be abused in subsequent facilities

Perhaps most disturbing is that in some facilities, the rates of victimization are astronomically higher than these national averages. Six juvenile facilities reported victimization rates exceeding 30%, with facilities like Backbone Mountain Youth Center in Maryland reporting rates above 36%.

These numbers represent real children who entered the juvenile justice system—often for minor offenses—and instead of receiving rehabilitation, experienced profound trauma that may affect them for the rest of their lives.

The situation in immigration detention facilities is equally concerning. Between September 2018 and April 2022, 922 sexual assault allegations were reported to ICE facility administration. Of these:

  • 29.5% involved facility staff as alleged perpetrators
  • 66.4% involved other detainees
  • 4.1% involved non-detainee inmates
  • Only 12.8% of all allegations were substantiated after investigation
  • Staff-perpetrated allegations had the lowest substantiation rate at just 3.3%
  • Allegations against staff increased by a staggering 134% between 2019 and 2021

Human Rights Watch and other advocacy organizations have documented that the actual number of incidents is likely much higher. According to government documents obtained by the ACLU, nearly 200 allegations of sexual abuse from detainees in immigration detention facilities were fielded by government officials since 2007 alone—a figure widely considered to be a significant undercount.

The monthly rate of sexual assault allegations in ICE facilities ranges from 0.47 to 2.47 per 1,000 detainees—up to 3.5 times higher than the general U.S. population rate of 0.58 per 1,000 persons.

Why Are Youth and Immigrant Detainees So Vulnerable?

Young detainee looking through bars of detention facility - detention center sex abuse

When you look into the eyes of young people or immigrants behind detention center bars, you're seeing individuals caught in a perfect storm of vulnerability. Detention center sex abuse thrives in these environments not by accident, but because of specific conditions that leave detainees with little protection and even less power.

Think about it – in detention, every aspect of your life is controlled by others. Your meals, your shower time, your ability to communicate with loved ones – all depend on staff who hold complete authority over you. This extreme power imbalance creates fertile ground for exploitation.

"The juvenile justice system has been a natural safe haven for sexual predators," explained an attorney representing over 500 victims in Los Angeles County. This disturbing truth reflects how these institutions can attract individuals specifically looking for access to vulnerable populations.

For young people in juvenile detention, the cards are stacked against them from the start. Nearly one-third of girls and 7% of boys enter the system already carrying the wounds of previous sexual abuse, making them statistically more likely to be victimized again. LGBTQ+ youth face even higher risks, reporting significantly higher rates of both peer and staff sexual victimization.

Many of these children struggle with mental health challenges that can be manipulated by predators. And even when abuse occurs, many young people don't fully understand their rights or fear they won't be believed – after all, they've already been labeled as "troubled" or "criminal."

For immigrants in detention, the situation is equally concerning but with additional layers of vulnerability. Language barriers often prevent them from understanding their rights or reporting abuse effectively. Many live in constant fear of deportation, making them reluctant to report staff misconduct. Cut off from family, friends, and legal support, they face their ordeal in profound isolation.

Institutional Culture and Staffing Gaps

The culture inside detention facilities often enables rather than prevents detention center sex abuse. It's troubling that nearly 50% of staff-perpetrated sexual incidents involve workers with less than a year on the job – suggesting serious problems with how facilities hire, screen, and train their employees.

Background checks are frequently inadequate, allowing individuals with concerning histories to gain access to vulnerable populations. Even well-intentioned staff often receive minimal training on appropriate boundaries, PREA standards, and trauma-informed care.

Perhaps most disturbing is how quickly misconduct becomes normalized in these environments. Inappropriate comments and harassment are often dismissed as "just joking around," creating a slippery slope toward more serious abuse.

"There was this attitude that these kids were criminals and didn't deserve the same protections," shared one former juvenile detention officer. "That mentality creates a breeding ground for abuse."

Chronic understaffing compounds these problems. Without proper supervision ratios, opportunities for abuse multiply, especially during night shifts when fewer eyes are watching.

Physical Layout and Operational Practices

The very design of detention facilities inadvertently creates opportunities for detention center sex abuse. Facilities are filled with blind spots where cameras don't reach and staff visibility is limited. Shower and bathroom areas – where nearly 50% of reported incidents occur – offer particular challenges for supervision while maintaining basic dignity.

Another 50% of incidents happen in sleeping quarters, while a staggering 80% take place in common spaces that should, in theory, be the most supervised areas of the facility.

Ironically, protocols designed to protect vulnerable detainees can sometimes increase their risk. One-to-one watch for suicidal youth, for example, can isolate them with a single staff member with minimal oversight. As one survivor recounted: "I was placed on suicide watch, which meant a staff member was with me 24/7. That's when the abuse happened—when everyone thought I was being protected."

Transportation between facilities creates another high-risk situation, with detainees often alone with staff members in vehicles. And during night shifts, when staffing levels drop and supervision decreases, opportunities for abuse increase dramatically.

These vulnerabilities aren't just theoretical concerns – they're the lived reality for thousands of young people and immigrants in detention facilities across America. Understanding these risk factors is the first step toward creating meaningful change and protecting those who currently have little power to protect themselves.

Barriers to Reporting and Gaps in Accountability

Broken emergency phone in detention facility corridor - detention center sex abuse

Despite how common detention center sex abuse is, most victims never report what happened to them. And when they do, justice is often out of reach. The reasons for this silence aren't hard to understand when you look at the situation through a survivor's eyes.

For many detainees, staying quiet feels like the only safe choice. They worry about retaliation from staff who control every aspect of their daily lives. They fear not being believed—after all, who would take the word of someone labeled as a "criminal" or "illegal immigrant" over that of an authority figure? Many worry about being thrown into solitary confinement "for their protection" or losing what few privileges they have. For immigrant detainees, there's the added fear that reporting abuse might hurt their immigration cases.

"I kept quiet because I knew what would happen if I spoke up," one former juvenile detainee told me. "They'd call me a liar, or worse, put me in isolation. And being alone with my thoughts after what happened... that would've been unbearable."

Even when brave individuals do come forward, the system often fails them spectacularly. Of the 922 sexual assault allegations reported in ICE facilities between 2018 and 2022, only 12.8% were found to be substantiated after investigation. When staff members were the accused, that number dropped to a shocking 3.3%.

The situation in juvenile facilities isn't much better. When staff-on-youth sexual abuse is actually confirmed, only 31% of cases result in any legal action against the perpetrator. Instead, half of these staff members are simply fired or not rehired—free to seek employment at other facilities with their records clean.

As one advocate who works with survivors put it: "The system protects itself, not the victims. When the same agencies running these facilities are also investigating abuse allegations, there's an obvious conflict of interest."

The deck is stacked against survivors of detention center sex abuse from the start. Many facilities require detainees to file formal grievances within impossibly short timeframes—sometimes just 48 hours after an incident. This requirement comes at a time when many victims are still processing their trauma and may not be emotionally ready to talk about what happened.

The legal landscape creates additional problems. The Department of Justice has proposed explicitly excluding immigration detention facilities from Prison Rape Elimination Act coverage, leaving these vulnerable populations without critical protections. Many states had short statutes of limitations that expired before victims felt safe enough to come forward, though recent reforms are changing this.

Federal law creates a significant loophole by failing to extend criminal jurisdiction to abuse occurring in contract detention facilities—where many immigrants are held. And while 43 states classify sexual abuse of inmates by staff as a felony, federal law treats non-forced sexual abuse as a misdemeanor, sending a troubling message about how seriously these crimes are taken.

The burden of proof in criminal cases—evidence "beyond a reasonable doubt"—is especially difficult to meet in detention settings where there are few witnesses and limited physical evidence. The result? According to Department of Justice data, 73% of staff convicted of sexually abusing inmates received only probation rather than prison sentences.

"The legal system isn't built to deliver justice to people society has already written off," explained a legal advocate working with detention abuse survivors. "We need to rethink these structures from the ground up."

Culture of Silence Around Detention Center Sex Abuse

Beyond formal barriers, a powerful culture of silence surrounds detention center sex abuse. This isn't accidental—it's reinforced through daily practices and institutional responses.

Facilities often react to abuse allegations with denial and minimization, more concerned with protecting their reputation than addressing harm. Staff members may pressure witnesses not to cooperate with investigations, creating an atmosphere where loyalty to colleagues trumps the safety of those in their care.

When victims do come forward, their credibility is frequently attacked. Their criminal histories or immigration status become weapons used to undermine their accounts. Many are isolated after reporting—placed in segregation that feels more like punishment than protection. This sends a chilling message to others considering speaking up.

"I felt like my innocence was robbed," shared one former juvenile detention resident. "I didn't tell anyone because who would believe me over a guard? I was just a kid with a record."

Most facilities lack adequate mental health services to help victims process their trauma, leaving them to cope with these experiences alone. Poor record-keeping makes it nearly impossible to identify patterns of abuse that might point to serial predators within the system.

This wall of silence doesn't just harm individual victims—it creates the perfect environment for abuse to continue unchecked, putting countless other vulnerable people at risk. Breaking through this silence requires structural changes, independent oversight, and a fundamental shift in how we view the humanity of detained people.

If you or someone you know has experienced detention center abuse, contact Justice Hero to learn about your options for seeking accountability.

Lawsuits, Settlements, and Legislative Reform Momentum

Courthouse steps with advocates for detention abuse survivors - detention center sex abuse

The tide is finally turning in the fight against detention center sex abuse. After decades of silence, a powerful wave of lawsuits and legislative reforms is cracking the foundations of impunity that have protected abusers for far too long.

State legislatures across the country have begun extending or eliminating statutes of limitations for childhood sexual abuse claims, giving survivors a voice they've never had before. The impact has been immediate and profound.

In Maryland alone, more than 3,500 people have come forward with lawsuits since the Child Victims Act took effect in 2023. Many of these brave individuals are sharing stories of abuse that occurred in the state's juvenile detention facilities—some dating back decades.

"These lawsuits aren't just about money," explains a survivor who recently filed in Maryland. "They're about acknowledgment. For years, nobody believed us. Now, finally, someone is listening."

This pattern is repeating nationwide. In Illinois, over 90 plaintiffs have joined the fight for justice. New York City has seen more than 150 cases filed. New Jersey has at least 50 plaintiffs stepping forward. And in Los Angeles County, an astounding 600+ victims have initiated civil actions since 2022.

The financial stakes are enormous. In Maryland, where damage caps limit awards to $890,000 per occurrence against state entities, the total potential liability runs into billions. This financial pressure is creating powerful incentives for meaningful reform that criminal prosecutions alone never achieved.

In May 2024, the Justice Department announced an investigation into Kentucky's youth detention facilities, showing that federal authorities are also taking notice of these systemic issues.

How Litigation Is Reshaping Accountability

Civil litigation has emerged as a surprisingly effective tool against detention center sex abuse. Where criminal prosecutions often fail due to high evidentiary standards, civil cases are driving real change.

"The beauty of civil litigation is that it targets the whole system, not just individual bad actors," explains an attorney who represents dozens of survivors. "We're holding institutions accountable for creating environments where abuse flourished."

Civil cases require only a "preponderance of evidence" rather than proof "beyond reasonable doubt," making them more accessible to survivors with limited evidence. They also force institutions to open their books during findy, revealing internal documents and data that often expose systemic failures.

The financial consequences can be substantial. In California, the Ninth Circuit affirmed an $850,000 settlement for victims abused by a county juvenile hall officer. Some courts have awarded triple damages in cases where institutions actively covered up abuse. These settlements don't just compensate victims—they create powerful financial incentives for reform.

Perhaps most importantly, high-profile cases generate media coverage that raises public awareness. "For decades, this abuse happened in the shadows," says one advocate. "Now it's front-page news, and people are finally paying attention."

You can learn more about these and other cases on our all lawsuits page.

State-by-State Shifts in Statutes of Limitations

The legal landscape for detention center sex abuse cases has transformed dramatically in recent years. State after state has reformed outdated statutes of limitations that once blocked survivors from seeking justice.

Maryland has eliminated its statute of limitations entirely for abuse occurring after January 1, 2024. New Jersey now allows survivors to file suits until age 55 or within seven years of understanding the harm caused by their abuse. New York City created a special lookback window (closing in March 2025) that temporarily suspends the statute of limitations for older cases.

California has removed time limits for sexual abuse claims filed after January 1, 2024, while Arkansas established a revival window from 2022-2024 that allows survivors to file regardless of when the abuse occurred.

These reforms acknowledge a simple truth: trauma takes time to process. Many survivors aren't ready to come forward until decades after their abuse, when they've had time to understand what happened and build the emotional strength to confront it.

"If they lower the limit, unfortunately, it's going to send a message to survivors that they're not worth as much as everybody else," warned David Lorenz, Maryland director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, responding to proposals that would cap damages for victims.

For survivors navigating this complex legal landscape, resources like the Child USA tracker provide essential guidance on the patchwork of state laws that determine their access to justice.

Framework showing prevention strategies for detention center sexual abuse including oversight, training, reporting mechanisms, and trauma-informed care - detention center sex abuse infographic

Preventing Detention Center Sex Abuse: Roadmap for Change

PREA training session for detention facility staff - detention center sex abuse

Preventing detention center sex abuse requires a comprehensive approach that addresses the root causes and systemic failures that allow abuse to flourish. Based on research, survivor testimony, and expert recommendations, we've identified several critical areas for reform.

First and foremost, there must be a fundamental shift from punishment to rehabilitation in juvenile justice, and from detention to alternatives in immigration enforcement. The inherent power imbalances in detention settings create conditions where abuse can thrive, regardless of policies and oversight.

"Detention itself inherently fosters conditions for abuse," noted one expert who has studied these issues for decades. This reality suggests that the most effective prevention strategy may be reducing the number of people—especially children—in detention facilities altogether.

For those who must remain in detention, several key reforms are essential:

  1. Implement zero-tolerance policies with real consequences for violations
  2. Provide comprehensive staff training on boundaries, trauma, and PREA standards
  3. Ensure independent oversight through unannounced inspections and external monitors
  4. Create multiple, accessible reporting channels that detainees can use without fear
  5. Adopt trauma-informed approaches that recognize and address the vulnerabilities of detainees
  6. Improve facility design to eliminate blind spots and high-risk areas
  7. Strengthen hiring practices with thorough background checks and ongoing supervision
  8. Ensure proper staffing ratios to prevent isolation of detainees with individual staff
  9. Implement body cameras and comprehensive video monitoring
  10. Provide adequate mental health services for all detainees

Michele Deitch, a prison oversight expert, emphasizes that "facilities need high-quality leadership and independent monitoring to curb abuse." This external accountability is crucial because internal oversight has repeatedly proven insufficient.

Survivor and Advocate Recommendations

Survivors of detention center sex abuse and their advocates offer particularly valuable insights into prevention strategies:

  • Close large facilities: Research suggests that smaller, community-based facilities have lower rates of sexual victimization
  • Gender-responsive staffing: Ensure appropriate gender matching between staff and detainees, particularly in sensitive situations
  • Strengthen PREA implementation: Fully fund and enforce PREA standards across all types of detention facilities
  • Empower ombudsman programs: Independent ombudsmen can investigate complaints without institutional conflicts of interest
  • Support peer advocacy: Former detainees can help current residents understand their rights and reporting options
  • Eliminate isolation as punishment: Solitary confinement increases vulnerability and discourages reporting
  • Provide education on healthy relationships: Many detainees lack understanding of appropriate boundaries
  • Ensure access to legal counsel: Attorneys can advocate for detainees who experience abuse

One successful model comes from Alaska, where a detention center implemented a tiered cultural shift program that dramatically reduced the use of restraints and isolation while improving safety for both youth and staff.

What Policymakers and the Public Can Do Now

Addressing detention center sex abuse requires action at all levels:

Federal level:

  • Amend federal law to classify staff sexual abuse of inmates as a felony rather than a misdemeanor
  • Extend federal criminal jurisdiction to cover contract detention facilities
  • Ensure PREA coverage for all immigration detention facilities
  • Increase maximum penalties for sexual abuse of a ward to at least 5 years' imprisonment
  • Fund independent monitoring and oversight of all detention facilities

State level:

  • Extend or eliminate statutes of limitations for sexual abuse claims
  • Establish independent oversight commissions with unannounced inspection authority
  • Require transparent reporting of all sexual abuse allegations and outcomes
  • Implement trauma-informed training requirements for all detention staff
  • Shift resources from large institutions to smaller, community-based alternatives

Public action:

  • Support organizations advocating for detention reform
  • Contact legislators to support bills strengthening protections for detainees
  • Raise awareness about detention conditions in your community
  • Demand transparency from local detention facilities
  • Amplify survivor stories and center their voices in policy discussions

"These abuses must end," says one advocate. "Everyone in custody deserves respect and dignity." By working together at all levels, we can create detention environments where sexual abuse is neither tolerated nor hidden.

Frequently Asked Questions about Detention Center Sex Abuse

At Justice Hero, we hear from survivors and families navigating the painful aftermath of detention center sex abuse every day. These questions come from real people facing real trauma – here are thoughtful answers to the questions we hear most often:

What steps can a survivor take immediately after abuse?

If you or someone you know has experienced sexual abuse in detention, your safety and wellbeing come first. While every situation is unique, there are several important steps to consider.

Reporting the abuse through available channels is crucial, though we understand how frightening this can be. You might tell a trusted staff member, file a formal grievance, call a PREA hotline, or reach out to an outside organization like an ombudsman or legal aid group.

Seeking medical attention serves two vital purposes – caring for your health and documenting evidence. Even if there are no visible injuries, a medical exam creates an official record of what happened.

"The hardest part was finding the courage to speak up," one survivor told us. "But documenting everything became my power – writing down dates, times, locations, and who I told."

Preserving any physical evidence like clothing or written communications can strengthen your case later. And reaching out for legal support from advocates who specialize in detention abuse cases can provide crucial guidance – many organizations offer these services at no cost.

Your immediate safety matters most. If reporting puts you at risk of retaliation, it may be wiser to wait until you have outside support or are in a safer situation.

Can I file a claim if the abuse happened decades ago?

For many survivors, the answer is now yes – and this represents a profound shift in our legal system's understanding of trauma. Recent reforms have dramatically expanded options for survivors with older cases:

Many states have created temporary "lookback windows" allowing previously time-barred claims to be filed regardless of when the abuse happened. These windows acknowledge that trauma doesn't operate on a convenient legal timeline.

States have also extended their statutes of limitations, often allowing survivors to file claims until they reach ages 40-55 or within a set period after connecting their current struggles with past abuse. Some states like Maryland and California have gone further, eliminating time limits entirely for sexual abuse occurring after January 1, 2024.

The impact has been profound. Under Maryland's Child Victims Act, survivors no longer face time limits for filing civil claims related to childhood sexual abuse. In New Jersey, survivors can now sue until age 55 or within seven years of understanding the harm caused by their abuse.

These reforms recognize what trauma experts have long understood – many survivors need years or even decades before they're emotionally ready to confront what happened to them through the legal system.

Are staff ever criminally prosecuted for detention center sex abuse?

Yes, but the numbers tell a troubling story about accountability gaps. According to Department of Justice data, only 31% of substantiated staff-on-youth sexual abuse incidents result in any legal action. The statistics are even more disheartening in immigration detention, where just 3.3% of staff-perpetrated allegations are substantiated.

Several systemic factors contribute to this justice gap. Under federal law, non-forced sexual abuse of inmates by staff is classified as a misdemeanor rather than a felony – unlike laws in 43 states that impose felony penalties. This classification signals to prosecutors that these cases aren't priorities.

Jurisdictional confusion creates additional problems, especially in contract facilities where federal criminal jurisdiction doesn't clearly apply. Evidence challenges are significant in closed environments with limited witnesses, and there's often an implicit bias against believing detainees over staff.

Even when prosecutions succeed, penalties frequently fall short of justice. A DOJ report revealed that 73% of staff convicted of sexually abusing inmates received probation rather than prison sentences.

This accountability gap explains why civil litigation has become such a vital avenue for justice. Civil cases can succeed where criminal prosecution fails and can target the institutions that enable abuse rather than just individual perpetrators.

At Justice Hero, we're committed to helping survivors understand all their options for seeking accountability and healing, regardless of when their abuse occurred or how the criminal justice system responded.

Conclusion

The crisis of detention center sex abuse isn't just shocking statistics on a page—it's a human tragedy playing out behind locked doors across America. This isn't about a few "bad apples" or isolated incidents. We're facing a systemic failure that has allowed thousands of vulnerable young people and immigrants to be victimized while under government care and custody.

When we look at the numbers—5.8% of incarcerated youth reporting staff sexual misconduct, 922 sexual assault allegations in ICE facilities over just four years, documented abuse across juvenile facilities in 29 states—it's easy to become numb. But each number represents a real person whose trust was violated in the most profound way possible.

I'm encouraged by the legal reforms we're seeing and the accountability they're beginning to create. The more than 3,500 survivors in Maryland who have come forward since the Child Victims Act took effect are forcing a long-overdue reckoning with decades of institutional failure. From Illinois to California, similar patterns are emerging as survivors find their voices and demand justice.

But lawsuits alone can't solve this crisis. Real change requires addressing the root causes:

We need stronger oversight mechanisms with true independence from the institutions they monitor. We need better screening and training for staff who work with these vulnerable populations. Our approach must be trauma-informed, recognizing the unique vulnerabilities many detainees bring with them. Multiple accessible reporting channels must exist so victims can safely come forward. And we need swift consequences for perpetrators and the institutions that shield them.

Most fundamentally, we should be asking whether detention is necessary at all in many cases, especially for youth and asylum seekers.

At Justice Hero, we're deeply committed to supporting survivors of detention center sex abuse as they steer their paths toward healing and justice. By amplifying their voices, educating the public, and advocating for meaningful change, we believe we can help create detention environments where sexual abuse is neither tolerated nor hidden.

The children and adults in our nation's detention facilities have lost their freedom, but they haven't lost their humanity or their fundamental right to safety and dignity. It's on all of us to ensure these rights are protected.

If you or someone you know has experienced sexual abuse in a detention facility, please know you're not alone. You deserve justice, and there are people ready to help. The first step toward healing and accountability begins when we break the silence together.

On This Page

Case Status:

Defendants:

Injuries:

envelopephonemap-markercrossmenu